Scope an agency's AI transparency implementation project

When to use this guide

An agency is asked to make a client's chatbot compliant without receiving the live interface, role facts or output paths.

This is a fictional implementation scenario. The procedure below is Article 50 Hub's suggested working method, not a prescribed legal form, a customer result or a claim that every step is an additional statutory requirement.

Review procedure

1. Collect the actual deployment surfaces and representative user journeys.

2. Record the client's scope decisions and unresolved questions requiring qualified review.

3. Define technical deliverables such as notice integration, test records and versioned handover.

4. State dependencies and acceptance checks before estimating completion.

What the example review finds

• The request has no defined deployment scope.

• The client expects a certificate from a technical implementation service.

Keep these example observations separate from your own results. An unknown or untested state should stay open until the relevant evidence has been inspected.

Fields for your working record

• System scope

• Client facts

• Technical deliverable

• Dependency

• Acceptance check

Use the downloadable blank worksheet linked on this page to connect the observed behavior with the deployed system. Add a reviewer, date, evidence reference, unresolved questions and a next action. The worksheet is editable locally and does not upload your records to Article 50 Hub.

Completion and handoff

Close the task only for the scope actually reviewed. Preserve the result that another authorized reviewer can reproduce, identify the owner of remaining work, and record a retest when the implementation changes. A completed worksheet is not a substitute for the underlying evidence.

Decision boundary

A technical project scope does not certify compliance or establish the client's legal obligations.

The official references below provide legal or technical context. Resolve applicability and exception questions with the responsible qualified reviewer; use the product's tools to organize implementation work within that assessment.