Test AI identity when a disclosure script is blocked

When to use this guide

A content security policy blocks the disclosure bundle while the main chatbot continues to accept messages.

This is a fictional implementation scenario. The procedure below is Article 50 Hub's suggested working method, not a prescribed legal form, a customer result or a claim that every step is an additional statutory requirement.

Review procedure

1. List which resources render the identity cue and which enable the conversation.

2. Simulate a blocked or failed notice resource in an authorized test environment.

3. Observe the resulting user interface and any misleading partial state.

4. Adjust the integration and preserve evidence that failure behavior remains understandable.

What the example review finds

• The assistant remains usable without any identity label.

• The only failure signal appears in the developer console.

Keep these example observations separate from your own results. An unknown or untested state should stay open until the relevant evidence has been inspected.

Fields for your working record

• Blocked resource

• CSP condition

• Interaction state

• Visible identity

• Failure handling

Use the downloadable blank worksheet linked on this page to connect the observed behavior with the deployed system. Add a reviewer, date, evidence reference, unresolved questions and a next action. The worksheet is editable locally and does not upload your records to Article 50 Hub.

Completion and handoff

Close the task only for the scope actually reviewed. Preserve the result that another authorized reviewer can reproduce, identify the owner of remaining work, and record a retest when the implementation changes. A completed worksheet is not a substitute for the underlying evidence.

Decision boundary

This procedure does not recommend weakening security policy or treating a script load as proof of compliance.

The official references below provide legal or technical context. Resolve applicability and exception questions with the responsible qualified reviewer; use the product's tools to organize implementation work within that assessment.