Official-source-backed technical resource
Track unresolved transparency implementation questions
Keep unanswered scope and implementation questions distinct from confirmed defects. Includes a free implementation worksheet.
Short answer
Keep unanswered scope and implementation questions distinct from confirmed defects. Assign an owner, evidence needed and next decision to each item.
Download the blank working record (.md)
When to use this guide
A team records marking adequacy as complete even though its vendor has not explained how a text export is detected.
This is a fictional implementation scenario. The procedure below is Article 50 Hub's suggested working method, not a prescribed legal form, a customer result or a claim that every step is an additional statutory requirement.
Review procedure
-
Write the unresolved question in terms of a specific system or output path.
-
List the facts already known and the evidence still needed.
-
Assign the appropriate technical or qualified review owner.
-
Record interim handling and update the status only when the question is actually resolved.
What the example review finds
-
The vendor response is still pending.
-
The checklist marks an unknown capability as implemented.
Keep these example observations separate from your own results. An unknown or untested state should stay open until the relevant evidence has been inspected.
Fields for your working record
-
Question
-
Known facts
-
Missing evidence
-
Decision owner
-
Interim handling
Use the downloadable blank worksheet linked on this page to connect the observed behavior with the deployed system. Add a reviewer, date, evidence reference, unresolved questions and a next action. The worksheet is editable locally and does not upload your records to Article 50 Hub.
Completion and handoff
Close the task only for the scope actually reviewed. Preserve the result that another authorized reviewer can reproduce, identify the owner of remaining work, and record a retest when the implementation changes. A completed worksheet is not a substitute for the underlying evidence.
Decision boundary
A risk register does not authorize noncompliance or establish that an unresolved issue is acceptable.
The official references below provide legal or technical context. Resolve applicability and exception questions with the responsible qualified reviewer; use the product's tools to organize implementation work within that assessment.
Official sources
- EU AI Act — legal text and contextEUR-Lex
- Commission FAQ — transparency obligations and scopeEuropean Commission
- Article 50 Service Desk — read with its amendment notice and current Commission guidanceEuropean Commission
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23. This is technical implementation information, not legal advice.