Review multilingual AI identity notices

When to use this guide

A French page opens a chatbot whose notice falls back to English while its input and replies are French.

This is a fictional implementation scenario. The procedure below is Article 50 Hub's suggested working method, not a prescribed legal form, a customer result or a claim that every step is an additional statutory requirement.

Review procedure

1. List supported locales and the notice source used for each.

2. Have a competent reviewer check meaning and clarity of translated identity wording.

3. Test missing translations, browser-language differences and language switches.

4. Record the displayed locale and any mismatch separately from model response language.

What the example review finds

• The notice fallback differs from the rest of the interface.

• A language switch updates replies but leaves the identity label unchanged.

Keep these example observations separate from your own results. An unknown or untested state should stay open until the relevant evidence has been inspected.

Fields for your working record

• Requested locale

• Displayed locale

• Approved wording

• Fallback behavior

• Translation reviewer

Use the downloadable blank worksheet linked on this page to connect the observed behavior with the deployed system. Add a reviewer, date, evidence reference, unresolved questions and a next action. The worksheet is editable locally and does not upload your records to Article 50 Hub.

Completion and handoff

Close the task only for the scope actually reviewed. Preserve the result that another authorized reviewer can reproduce, identify the owner of remaining work, and record a retest when the implementation changes. A completed worksheet is not a substitute for the underlying evidence.

Decision boundary

A translated notice does not establish accessibility, jurisdictional scope or the adequacy of other product disclosures.

The official references below provide legal or technical context. Resolve applicability and exception questions with the responsible qualified reviewer; use the product's tools to organize implementation work within that assessment.